Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 341 - 360
of 11,607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Framing the Case More importantly, the defendants raise these readings of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Read reviews, ask for references, and check their standing with professional organizations. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 2:01 am
Translated: the BoA found Prada’s appeal not particularly well-construed and made a remark that reads a bit like a (figurative) slap on the wrist: since in the case at issue the applicant is exclusively relying on the inherent distinctiveness of the mark applied for, this argument cannot succeed, since, in particular, as it has been concluded, the elements forming the sign applied for do not allow to conclude that it diverges from the norm or customs of the sector… [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 2:18 pm
Read more about the difference between OWI and DUI. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 1:24 am
NanoString has announced it will appeal the order in the UPC Court of Appeal in Luxembourg. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit instructed the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm
An IU employee came and examined the window. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
Limitation on cross-examination related to Sell hearing was not error; trial court properly denied defendant’s request for special instruction on insanity. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:30 am
The Supreme Court in Flores examined what it means for a health care provider to render professional services under MICRA. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:25 am
Along the lines of this famous bon mot, Ferrari highlighted the persistent relevance of the lex loci arbitri by examining, among others, whether the provisions of the UN 1958 Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) require an “international” or rather a “domestic” reading. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
Because going armed to the terror of the public is a common law crime, the Court examined the long history of the offense in English law and its adoption in North Carolina. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:55 am
Regarding article 32, the BRPTO has an understanding already established that the date on which the technical examination of the patent application is requested is the final time limit for the applicant to voluntarily request changes to the set of claims, [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Contrary to its earlier decision in Brewer, when the relevant provisions were read in the entirety of the context, they plainly did not empower or authorize an employer or surety to unilaterally invoke and execute the enforcement mechanisms [see Arreola v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Appellate Court Case Not Originating with Appeals Board Abraham v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
So if I have the chance to be concrete and clear, I feel I have more of a chance for people to read what I write by keeping it simple. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
The Federal Circuit reviewed appeal of the claim construction de novo because the claim construction relied only on intrinsic evidence. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 1:58 am
The Applicant appealed to the Board. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
Optis asserted privilege on some documents that would confirm or gainsay some of the assertions as to the Portfolio quality, which means that these assertions could not be tested in cross-examination ([161]). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
”[4] For those of you who labor in this vineyard, I would suggest you read Ranges’ article and judge for yourself. [read post]
