Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 341 - 360 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am by Tobias Thienel
Shayler [2002] UKHL 11, [2003] 1 AC 247, at para. 113, citing with approval Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am by Andres
Then follows a detailed run through the case-law supporting the separation, including McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73, Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446, and Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am by INFORRM
The solution to this dilemma is now found in the Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd ([2001] 2 AC 127). [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:11 pm by J
It would not be fair , just and reasonable (as to which, see Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605) to impose a duty on the appellant to sue. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
What puzzles me slightly, particularly given the stated aim of consistency, is the difference in approach to that of Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (which I briefly discussed here). [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:11 pm by J
It would not be fair , just and reasonable (as to which, see Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605) to impose a duty on the appellant to sue. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
Du Cros Ltd. (1913) AC 624 at 634, 635) Lord Parker of Waddington having remarked upon the difficulty of finding the right criterion by which to determine whether a proposed mark is or is not "adapted to distinguish" the applicant's goods defined the crucial question practically as I have stated it, and added two sentences which have often been quoted but to which it is well to return for an understanding of the problem in a case such as the present. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
  Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA&… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:38 pm by Simon Gibbs
How about the following: “The principles established in Medway Oil and Storage Co Ltd v Continental Contractors Ltd [1929] AC 88, HL concerning the costs of claims and counterclaims have been largely overridden by the introduction of the CPR. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm
According to the BBC's report Strichting Brein had submitted a report at court claiming that Frederik Neij was the Chief Executive of Riversella Ltd. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by NL
Beedles v Guinness Northern Counties Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 442 This was the appeal of the first instance decision in Mr Beedle’s claim under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Section 24C. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 10:08 am by Giles Peaker
Ludgate House Ltd v Ricketts (VO) & Anor (RATING – HEREDITAMENT) (2019) UKUT 278 (LC) This was the appeal of the Valuation Tribunal’s decision that we reported here. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
In the Spycatcher case (Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109) and later in Attorney-General v Blake [1997] Ch 84 it was suggested that the Crown might have a constructive trust over the copyright in the two spys' books. [read post]