Search for: "ADOPTION OF N. B."
Results 341 - 360
of 2,846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
” Id. at 128 n.4 (cleaned up); see also Bell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
Smuggling alcohol is punishable by imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of up to 10,000 QR (about US$27,464) under article 272 of the aforementioned law. b. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
“Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here) Celis Aguilar, María Mayela “El convenio de la haya de 30 de junio de 2005 sobre acuerdos de elección de foro y su vinculación con el ‘proyecto sobre Sentencias’ (y viceversa)”, Revista mexicana de Derecho internacional privado y comprado N°40 (octubre de 2018), pp. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Bureau 1, 2 (2014); Robert B. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
In the adoption paperwork, I had to list everywhere I had lived in the last ten years. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
B. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
[B.] [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The draft language says that the FTC may adopt “technology-neutral regulations. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
The Background Story Section 317: The 1930’s and 1940’s In the Communications Act of 1934, Congress provided that for “[a]ll matter” provided by another person and for which broadcaster accepted any money, service or other valuable consideration” to broadcast, the broadcaster must announce the identity of the source of the material.[1] However, the provision may have “occupied a humble position in the regulatory design and [gone] virtually unnoticed”… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
" Max Crema & Lawrence B. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
[b.] [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:05 am
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244, 276 n.23 (2003) (racial preference that violated the Constitution also violated 42 U.S.C. 1981). [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:07 am
Finalement, les effets bénéfiques des politiques de vaccination excèdent ses effets délétères lorsqu’on considère les risques qui auraient été encourus en l’absence d’une telle politique. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
B. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
B. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm
" As the Supreme Court presciently noted in 1964, At the time the First Amendment was adopted, as today, there were those unscrupulous enough and skillful enough to use the deliberate or reckless falsehood as an effective political tool to unseat the public servant or even topple an administration. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:42 am
The Board pointed out, however, that formal adoption as an "official" seal is not a requirement of Section 2(b). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:42 am
The measure will go before the board again next Tuesday for final adoption. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
B. [read post]
