Search for: "ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US "
Results 341 - 360
of 3,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2023, 10:17 am
Snap appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:27 pm
The Court did sound the warning about advances in technology, however, and acknowledge that it was troubled the conclusion that no Fourth Amendment search or seizure occurs when police use a GPS or similar device as they have here. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
For another, timekeeping technology is far more advanced now than it was in the 1940s: Second, many of the problems in recording employee work time discussed in Anderson 70 years ago, when time was often kept by punching a clock, may be cured or ameliorated by technological advances that enable employees to track and register their work time via smartphones, tablets, or other devices. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Technology now allows inspirational messages to be conveyed not only in the locker room but also on social media. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:21 am
Introduction In an era marked by rapid technological advancements and the omnipresence of the internet, the boundaries of free speech have become more ambiguous than ever before. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
The majority relied exclusively on Section 230, in the process absolutely destroying some of the commonly-advanced arguments seeking to eviscerate Section 230. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm
The majority wisely explained: “The better analogy to this case is Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., 2017 WL 1034731 (W.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Read more about Everlaw in the LawNext Legal Technology Directory. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
This can be useful, for example, when the event is being broadcast in other countries and the broadcaster wishes to expose viewers to different advertisement content in different countries. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
Even so, the law still compels regulated entities to sort users by age, and the law uses a more stringent test than COPPA. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
It’s HUGE that the court says those don’t advance a legitimate state interest. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:36 pm
Intri-Plex Technologies Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
In this case, 1-800 Contacts used lawfare as a bullying threat. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:18 am
Last Friday, the 6th Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:25 am
In Yu v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
Like technology itself, the law is developing and changing quickly in areas affected by technological advancements. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
So, advancing an anti-China agenda by implementing policies inspired by China against seems…I don’t know, ironic in the Alanis Morrissette sense? [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:19 pm
The district court dismissed Baden’s Section 43 claims relating to Molten’s use of “proprietary” and “exclusive” because those terms suggested that Molten had invented the technology and were precluded by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
