Search for: "Adams for Use and Benefit Adams v. U.s" Results 341 - 360 of 440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
At the original trial the jury awarded $520,000 compensation for the appropriated land, as well as $300,000 for damages to the residue after the appropriation. 1 125 U.S. 2655 (2005). 2 2005 Ohio 6469; 2005 Ohio App. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Unconvinced, then, that this qualification was related to the ability to perform the telephone sales job, the majority held the would-be employer did not establish that it had an adequate reason to reject her (Adams v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
  Costs such as rent, utilities, equipment, wages and benefits for employees, and many other matters make owning and managing restaurants an expensive endeavor. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Without explanation, the court rejected the notion that the general judicial policy of deference to business decisions should apply to officers, which is obviously disturbing since courts are generally ill-equipped to substitute their business decisions (using the benefit of 20/20 hindsight) for the real-time business decisions of executives. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bill Marler
This representation, which the seller makes for its own benefit, leaves the customer ignorant of who actually manufactured the product”. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]