Search for: "Adams v. Green" Results 341 - 360 of 447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm by Graeme Hall
In the news: Prisoner voting remains in the headlines and given that the European Court of Human Rights has refused the UK government’s request to reconsider Greens and MT v UK, it’s not going to stray far. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Building on Adam Wagner’s earlier posts, I also offer a possible explanation as to why the panel of the Grand Chamber refused a rehearing of the Greens case. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am by Nabiha Syed
Board of Chosen Freeholders and Greene v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm by Graeme Hall
In the news As the UK government is requesting the referral of Greens and M.T. v UK to the Grand Chamber, with the intention that the European Court of Human Rights reconsiders the issue of prisoner voting, the Committee of Ministers, vested with the responsibility to oversee the enforcement of the Court’s judgments, has put on hold its ongoing review of the UK’s compliance with the decision in Hirst v UK (No. 2). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm by Melina Padron
See Adam Wagner’s commentary on the judgment. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
See our previous post on Greens and MT v UK, as well as our most recent summary of the ongoing prisoner voting issue. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Second, the Supreme Court will in the near future decide a case on the subject of compensation for miscarriage of justice in the case of R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:38 am by Amanda Rice
At her Court Beat blog, Joan Biskupic discusses Snyder v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
  John Adams put it well.Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.Schooling ought not, as I suggested in the first point, be all about passing on information. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:47 am by Andrew Weber
That fine was thrown out in 2008 by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in CBS v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: At Balkinization, Jamal Greene discusses Justice Thomas’s possible views on the Court’s 1944 decision in Korematsu v. [read post]