Search for: "Andrew Koppelman"
Results 341 - 360
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
The charge is wholly false, as detailed in an open letter to Senator Specter from Andrew Koppelman which begins, It has come to my attention that a footnote in my article, Forced Labor: A Thirteenth Amendment Defense of Abortion, 84 Northwestern U. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
Lash does not accurately describe the work of Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, Donald Regan, Robert Stern, and others. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 3:31 am
First, it was Northwestern University lawprof Andrew Koppelman, who stated the obvious, that Franks’ and Citron’s anti-revenge laws were obviously unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:54 am
(And there have been responses too, including a forthcoming book by Andrew Koppelman.) [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 2:25 pm
Andrew Koppelman's, and my amicus brief on the subject, as well as Prof. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Most recently, Professor Andrew Koppelman of Northwestern argued that the middle ground in the abortion fight is greater support for contraception, and a prominent conservative blog responded by rejecting the very idea that contraception could possibly have anything to do with reducing abortions.These assertions are astounding. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Among our five favorite comments from yesterday are these: Andrew Koppelman – DOMA is doomed The Supreme Court will probably strike down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which indiscriminately withholds federal recognition from same-sex marriages for all purposes – Social Security, health insurance for federal employees, family benefits for soldiers killed in action. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
Also analyzing the Supreme Court’s possible reaction to the case, Andrew Koppelman has an opinion piece in the L.A. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
in the longer run, we suspect that [it] will generate few, if any, additional victories for commercial employers seeking to impose the costs of their religious convictions on their employees”; Zoe Henson, who in The New Republic offers the perspective of a woman who uses contraception for medical reasons; Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic, who analyzes what he sees as the underlying reasons for some opposition to the mandate; Andrew Koppelman in The New Republic, who… [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:26 am
Unlike many this week, Andrew Koppelman considered the California same-sex marriage case’s opinion text more than its conclusions. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:23 am
Michael Dorf and Andrew Koppelman and me in our amicus brief in the case, and see Prof. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
As Robert Stern, Donald Regan, Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, and other scholars have concluded, the Committee was embracing, not rejecting, the Resolution’s concern about interstate collective action problems when it provided an enumeration. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:13 am
As my friend and colleague Andrew Koppelman once said (paraphrasing), slippery slope arguments are empirical, not theoretical. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs Religious Liberty? [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:43 pm
Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern) made much the same argument in an amicus brief we authored in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Andrew KoppelmanLinda McClain’s Who’s the Bigot? [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Entertaining Satan: Why We Tolerate Terrorist Incitement, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, 2017, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 17-25, Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 17-15, Andrew Koppelman, Northwestern University School of Law [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
Andrew Koppelman. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:52 am
The Law and Philosophy Workshop started out winter quarter with Douglas Laycock's presentation of his paper "Religious Liberty as Liberty. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am
Andrew Koppelman has written that such laws could plague same-sex couples with “constant, confusing changes in their legal status,” because “their marriage would cease (or, perhaps, become dormant; it is unclear whether it should spring back to life when they, or one of them, moves back to the state in which they were married). [read post]
