Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 341 - 360
of 890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 7:46 am
Writing for the Court, Justice Kennedy, joined by the Court’s four liberal justices, held that Florida’s law unconstitutionally limits the ability of capital defendants to demonstrate that they are mentally impaired under Atkins v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm
The appeals court made their decision to follow the holding of Atkins v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:14 am
Corp. v Utilisave, LLC, 63 AD3d 840 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Coverage of the Court’s decision in Schuette v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:31 pm
Atkins. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 2:47 pm
U.S. ex rel Barko v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:58 pm
Republished by Blog Post PromoterAnd the converse, says the Ninth, saves nothing, reports Michael Atkins: On June 11, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Western District’s award of attorney’s fees on the false designation of origin claim in Derek Andrew, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:46 am
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
Florida, the follow-up case to Atkins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 12:18 pm
Florida [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court will decide "whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Hall v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:01 am
3 Mar 2014, 4:28 am
Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, while in his column for The Atlantic Andrew Cohen argues that, “[i]f the Supreme Court meant what it said in Atkins [v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am
Florida: Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:05 pm
But, in its decision in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
Florida, in which the Court will consider whether Florida’s scheme for determining whether an inmate is intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for the death penalty is consistent with its 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
See Atkin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In Ford v. [read post]
