Search for: "Attorneys Title Agency, LLC" Results 341 - 360 of 536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 3:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Court rejected claims by the City and the Attorney General that requiring attorney representation in administrative hearings would have negative consequences. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
A company’s outside counsel was acting as an attorney-agent when doing a background investigation and therefore did not qualify as a reporting agency under the FCRA, ruled a federal court in the District of Columbia (Mattiaccio v G, II v DHA Group, Inc). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Katfriend Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (University of Cambridge, King’s College and Max Planck Institute), kindly hosted by Eleonora, investigates those really questions in this post.* Galileo sees stars as ESA logo marches on Jeremy reports on the General Court of the European Union’s decision in Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  As you might imagine from the title of this post, I’ll let you know. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(NP Fresno Land Acquisitions LLC, RPI) (3d Dist. 2014) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, No. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:05 am by SHG
  So the answer is let’s add another layer with a cool Russian title? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(North Sky River Energy, LLC, Jawbone Wind Energy, LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (5th Dist. 2014), __________ Cal.App.4th ___________, 2014 WL 3696543. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
June 13-1075Issue: Whether the two-year time limit for filing an administrative claim with the appropriate federal agency under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Jamie Dierks
”  Under it, the appellate court reviews the agency’s consistency decision directly, independent of the trial court’s decision, and judges the agency’s factual findings and interpretation of ambiguities under a deferential standard, i.e., upholding them if any reasonable person could have reached the same conclusion. [read post]