Search for: "BARKER v. BARKER." Results 341 - 360 of 691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his defense.3. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), Standards for Tax Court Review in Equitable Innocent Spouse Cases, 134 Tax Notes 981 (Feb. 20, 2012): In a case pending in the Ninth Circuit [Wilson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:22 am by Russ Bensing
A case of good lawyering was shown by the 8th’s decision a couple of weeks back in State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:12 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
That topic has been popular theme from readers of our prior blog postings - especially on EEOC o/b/o Serrano, et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 The government gets the very malleable and forgiving multifactor test of Barker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:20 am by Michael O'Hear
 The government gets the very malleable and forgiving multifactor test of Barker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:03 am by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman and Jonathan Barker On December 21, 2011, a California Court of Appeal held in Aleman v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by New Books Script
Toronto : Emond Montgomery, 2009 HV 9960 C2 W64 2009 Women and the criminal justice system : a Canadian perspective [edited by] Jane Barker. [read post]