Search for: "Baker Surveillance " Results 341 - 360 of 684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2022, 5:32 am by Stewart Baker
Nick thinks the damage can be limited to Facebook, Google and surveillance capitalism, so he isn’t shedding any tears over that outcome. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:13 am by Elliot Setzer
Stewart Baker argued that recovered COVID-19 patients could be a vital resource for public health and for the economy. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 7:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Stewart Baker interviewed Betsy Cooper and Steve Weber on the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Baker, General Counsel, Federal Bureau of InvestigationAlice S. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Stephanie Pell argued that the government should be more transparent about how it interprets its existing surveillance authorities and Fourth Amendment obligations in the context of its efforts to improve the nation's cybersecurity. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 3:27 pm by Robert Chesney
Location: Sheffield-Massey Room (Townes Hall 2.111), UT School of Law 9:00am - 9:30am         Welcome and breakfast: Introduction by Judge James Baker 9:30am - 10:30am       SESSION 1: Cyber in the Intelligence/Surveillance Context Bill Banks (Syracuse) Jen Daskal (American) 10:45am - 11:45am     SESSION 2: Cyber in the Criminal Law Context Paul Ohm (Georgetown) Jennifer Granick (Stanford) Richard Downing (Justice Department) Sean… [read post]
30 May 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
That effort would result in a conviction of FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith for making false statements by altering key evidence to obtain secret surveillance orders against Trump associate Carter Page. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:22 am by Stewart Baker
Freed from the prospect that any of the governments that appoint them will have to live with these rules, the judges of the CJEU declare that large chunks of U.S. intelligence law—including some of America's most productive and essential authorities, such as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)—are beyond the pale. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am by Lev Sugarman
Sugarman posted a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order clarifying that Matthew Whitaker did not bring any action before the court during his tenure. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Sam duPont argued that American law enforcement authorities have taken advantage of the lack of legislation governing surveillance capabilities and proposed policy measures to address concerns associated with facial recognition technologies. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by Anna Salvatore
Baker also spoke with Jamil Jaffer, Nate Jones and Maury Shenk about the latest news in cyberlaw. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am by Elliot Setzer
Key provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) are set to lapse temporarily on Sunday after President Trump threatened on Thursday to veto a bipartisan bill to extend them. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Fagaza that ruled that a provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not displace the state secrets privilege. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 5:10 am by William Ford
 Stewart Baker offered a bleaker perspective on McCabe’s departure. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm by Tia Sewell
Stewart Baker analyzed the European Court of Justice's Schrems II decision and described actions the United States can take in response. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am by Tara Hofbauer
” Stewart Baker gave us the most recent Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am by Matt Gluck
Baker III Chair at the University of Texas School of Law, and Trey Herr, director of the Cyber Statecraft Initiative under the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council, joined Benjamin Wittes for a conversation about their recent Lawfare piece discussing President Biden's executive order on cybersecurity. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:57 pm by Stewart Baker
Nate also provides a remarkably clear explanation of the sordid tale of European intelligence and law enforcement agencies trying to cut a special deal for themselves in the face of surveillance-hostile rulings from the EU's Court of Justice. [read post]