Search for: "Banks v. State of Louisiana" Results 341 - 360 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Louisiana, No. 06-10119 A Louisiana conviction for first-degree murder and death sentence is reversed where the trial judge committed clear error in its ruling on an objection to the prosecution's strike of a black juror during voir dire, in violation of Batson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Discover Bank Issue: Whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act, a suit seeking to enforce a state-law arbitration obligation arises under federal law if the petition to compel itself raises no federal question but the dispute sought to be arbitrated involves federal law. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 4:20 pm
Louisiana (07-343), Plains Commerce Bank v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Smalley, No. 06-4552 A sentence for bank robbery is vacated and remanded for resentencing where: 1) the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement for "otherwise us[ing]" a dangerous weapon during the course of a bank robbery, as opposed to a three-level enhancement for "brandish[ing] or possess[ing]" a dangerous weapon; and 2) the error was not harmless despite the district court's attempt to amend its judgment after the sentencing hearing… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Discover Bank Issue: Whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act, a suit seeking to enforce a state-law arbitration obligation arises under federal law if the petition to compel itself raises no federal question but the dispute sought to be arbitrated involves federal law. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
Louisiana (07-343), Plains Commerce Bank v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Below is the full schedule, with brief descriptions of the issues involved: Monday, April 14 No. 07-411, Plains Commerce Bank v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:06 pm
Louisiana (07-343); Plains Commerce Bank v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lee, No. 06-3438A sentence and restitution order for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed in part as to the restitution order as defendant's challenge to it was precluded by his plea agreement. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:49 pm
  That said, one proposition that, I suspect, most who litigate, teach, or write in the area have long thought -- since Coker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
The tendency of members of Congress to think about their own districts and states rather than the national interest is not new. [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am by ACS
., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]