Search for: "Bates v. Bates" Results 341 - 360 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
In support of his contention that the LVT could entertain such a challenge within its jurisdiction Mr Bates relied on Jonathan Parker LJ in Ruddy v Oakfern Properties [2006] EWCA Civ 1389: In my judgment there is no justification for implying any restriction in the entirely general words of section 27A of the [Landlord and Tenant Act 1985]. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
In support of his contention that the LVT could entertain such a challenge within its jurisdiction Mr Bates relied on Jonathan Parker LJ in Ruddy v Oakfern Properties [2006] EWCA Civ 1389: In my judgment there is no justification for implying any restriction in the entirely general words of section 27A of the [Landlord and Tenant Act 1985]. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
It ditched the lower court's strange interpretation of some language in Bates v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
 So, with apologies to any readers who may have been awaiting it with bated [please note correct spelling] breath, here's the story.The judgment referred to above is that of the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice the European Union (CJEU) in Case C‑98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Supreme Court), Denmark [a big Katpat to the CJEU, in dispensing with an… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am by Walter Olson
Nixon: We have the privilege of informing you that you ARE a crook My own contribution: @walterolson Bates v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am by Laura Sandwell
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation blog, Ethan Blevins urges the justices to “grant Brott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 On 13 January 2016, there is an application in the case of Weston v Bates and on 15 January 2016 an application in the case of McGrath v Bedford. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:37 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Myriad Genetics saga has been going on for several years now in the Land Down Under, and this writer has been waiting for the Australian High Court decision with bated breath. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Parental Authority, Incomplete Transfers, and Japanese Courts in Colonial Taiwan, 1919-1936” -Nurfadzilah Yahaya “Question of Guardianship in Colonial Southeast Asia: Arab Children under British and Dutch Rule” Commentator: MJ Maynes & Barbara Young Welke Panel 5: Class, Sexuality, Race and Social Order -Cynthia Greenlee “Due to Her Tender Age: African-Americans, Child Rape and South Carolina Courts, 1885-1905” -Sara Mayeux “Car Trouble: Adolescence,… [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:09 am by Anushka Limaye
Stephanie Zable analyzed how the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sessions v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
On SCOTUSblog, Ronald Collins interviews Lee Levine and Stephen Wermiel about their just published book, The Progeny: Justice William Brennan’s Fight to Save New York Times v. [read post]