Search for: "Battle v. Maryland"
Results 341 - 360
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
You would have had to wait until 1967, in Katz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 2:53 pm
Yesterday, in Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 9:00 pm
I disagreed with his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Maryland). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Chester: ballast water and the battle to balance state and federal regulatory interests. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
This testimony came from Mark Graber, a Regents Professor at the University of Maryland Law School, who has taught American political and constitutional history for 30 years. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Alan also has an interesting take on the Brady v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
In determining whether or not the judgment will be enforced, the court will evaluate what “comity,” as defined in Hilton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
Maryland or Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:50 pm
Maryland or Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
Stewart The battle over §2(b) of the latest restatement—which gives manufacturers a free pass from liability unless plaintiffs prove a reasonable alternative design—is far from over. [read post]
