Search for: "Battles v. U. S"
Results 341 - 360
of 446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
You know things are going well when the court begins its analysis by by observing that it's "[u]nclear … where Dr. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:01 am
DeSantis v Zito ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31059(U) ; April 24, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109753/09; Judge: Joan B. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:58 am
It's hiding inAccess Point Med., LLC v Mandell ;2011 NY Slip Op 30866(U) April 8, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 102082/2010 Here is how it goes. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:10 am
Under the Genentech scheme, Microsoft may win the battle but lose the war. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
U. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
S. 231, 249 (1996); Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
That could, obviously, create a serious battle between states and courts but it is presumably within the authority of the court. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
So Philadelphia came through for you when it came to battling anti-Semitism? [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 5:37 pm
Cases like Noelle v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm
U. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Chester: ballast water and the battle to balance state and federal regulatory interests. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Detainees’ lawyers have a full opportunity to challenge the reliability of the “hearsay” evidence, the new brief contended, and the preponderance standard of proof provides for a proper balance between the detainees’ interest in their liberty and the military’s need to keep “the enemy” from returning to battle against the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
As explained recently by the Supreme Court in eBay v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Rodney Gray and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC and is currently pending in the U. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:47 pm
The opposition document in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:18 am
The BIAW believes it will be successful in a challenge of the new law, due largely in part to the opinion handed down in the AHRI v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:57 am
Penry v. [read post]
