Search for: "Beecham v. Beecham"
Results 341 - 360
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2009, 7:04 am
– CAFC decision in Agilent Techs v Affymetrix concerning claims pertaining to ‘microarray hybridization’ (Gray on Claims) US: Counterclaims dismissed in Alzheimer’s Institute/ Mayo patent licensing dispute over transgenic mice (Patent Docs) Products (Tavanic) Levofloxacin – UK: EWCA upholds decision that Daiichi’s Levofloxacin patent and SPC both invalid: Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’ in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) – US: District Court New Jersey grants summary judgment of non-infringement in favour of Hospira, Teva and others concerning patent relating to Sanofi’s Eloxatin: Sanofi-Aventis v Sandoz (SmartBrief) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) (Patents4Life) General Europe’s ever changing landscape… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
This reasoning was, of course, nothing new and was summarised by the eminent Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smith Kline Beecham plc:"…the matter relied upon as prior art must disclose subject-matter which, if performed, would necessarily result in an infringement of the patent. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
See Mauldin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Also seeking a rehearing of the Federal Circuit's decision in Tafas were plaintiffs-appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 1:04-cv-01748, U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Cir. 2009, 08-1352) Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively “Appellees”) originally filed suit against the USPTO in relation to Final Rules published by the USPTO that placed [...] [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
SmithKline Beecham, ___ F. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 551 F.Supp.2d 993 (E.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2008 WL 4090995 (E.D. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:59 am
Plaintiffs-Appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:14 pm
Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare, 88 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2004), involving OTC nicotine gum used to stop smoking. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 4:38 pm
Collins v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 4:07 pm
Moden v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:02 pm
See Knipe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:05 pm
C.A.), Elloway v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:07 pm
Here is the abstract: In this essay, Professor Hanna discusses Beecham v.... [read post]
