Search for: "Behrend, Behrend "
Results 341 - 360
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Behrend the absence of a showing that injury can be proved on a classwide basis precludes class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); and (2) whether at the class certification stage of litigation a district court must analyze the admissibility of expert testimony under the standards set forth in Daubert v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:54 am
As to Pep Boys’ argument that the employees could not offer a method of measuring damages that could be applied class wide, as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v Behrend, the court noted that the Ninth Circuit has clarified that individualized damage calculations alone cannot defeat class certification. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Behrend, 632 A.2d 562, 565 (Pa. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Behrend further requires plaintiffs to propose a methodology for calculating damages common to the class.[8] Securities class action plaintiffs generally propose an event study to estimate how much artificial inflation was (i) triggered when the misinformation was disseminated or (ii) dissipated when disclosures ultimately corrected the misinformation. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Behrend, No. 11-864 (U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013), the Supreme Court decertified a class because the class’s expert’s damages calculations attributed damages to lawful conduct. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Behrend, 632 A.2d 562, 565 (Pa. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:29 am
Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013), the Supreme Court made clear that the obligation to find facts after a “rigorous analysis” applies to expert opinion, and that a court may not refuse “to entertain arguments against [a] damages model that bore on the propriety of class certification, simply because those arguments would also be pertinent to the merits determination. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:06 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Behrend—does not even cite the first case—Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:02 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Behrend are the two most significant examples. [read post]
5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2019: The Impact Of U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
Behrend are the two most significant examples. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Behrend, 12-864, even though the petitioners argued their case presented a different but complementary issue. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:05 am
If you are already an online subscriber to the LAW.COM service you should be able to click on any of the links below, sign in, and access the full text of all articles listed. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Behrend, No. 11-864, slip. op. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:05 am
If you are already an online subscriber to the LAW.COM service you should be able to click on any of the links below, sign in, and access the full text of all articles listed. [read post]
