Search for: "Berkeley v. Berkeley" Results 341 - 360 of 2,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Bartlett, Professor of Law at UC Berkeley School of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Business; Matthew D. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Menell, Professor, University of California, at Berkeley School of Law. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 4:47 pm by Ginzburg & Bronshteyn LLP
  The reality is many attorneys and fiduciaries in the probate bar are still unaware of the monumental consequences, rights and duties that evolved from the California Supreme case of Giraldin v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
The court further observed, quoting an earlier decision in Zeran v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:30 am by Karen Tani
Guest edited by my Berkeley Law colleague Christopher Tomlins, the volume brings together essays presented at the most recent "Law As... [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
The spending unleashed by this hope was just cresting as I reached the gleaming Berkeley campus as a freshman in 1977. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the Supreme Court of the United States, in trying to distinguish the “truly national” from the “truly local” in the context of the Commerce Clause, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:18 pm by Jim Lindgren
Phillips of Berkeley (tip to Glenn Reynolds and Paul Caron). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
On August 12, 2015, the Supreme Court transferred the matter back to the Third District for reconsideration in light of its decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
In an earlier post, I criticized the Berkeley Breathed children's story, Mars Needs Moms, for celebrating women's dedication to domestic drudgery. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
Any argument that Second Life could be protected under Section 230(c) of the Common Decency Act of 1996 must be tempered by the S.D.N.Y. opinion in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]