Search for: "Beverages, Inc., in Re"
Results 341 - 360
of 386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New USPTO procedures likely to delay action in requests for continued examination of patent applications (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) 12 Republican Senators send letter to Senate Majority Leader re concerns about post-grant review provisions in S.515 (Inventive Step) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Questions on acquiescence… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc., 92 USPQ2d 12982 (TTAB 2009) [precedential].The Marks: The Board found that term TERZA "clearly dominates over the term VOLTA in the registered mark. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Re-clarifying the aims and conclusions of the Mashelkar Committee Report (Spicy IP) India: will IP litigation be both 'punctual' and 'faithful'? [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
In re E. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 7:32 am
Although some beverages purchased are non-alcoholic, the others are. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
In re Sunland, Inc., Serial Nos. 77310231 and 77307289 (August 7, 2009) [not precedential].Of course, the two block-letter marks are "virtually identical. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 12:21 pm
The new beverage service was put into service without notice. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office) Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP) Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46) South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create… [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney fee awards may be… [read post]
24 May 2009, 3:49 pm
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 … [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
International Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
Contract counsel regarding matters/questions you may have re: this issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 11:53 am
No Transfer MDL No. 2026 -- In re AriZona Beverage Co. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Peerless Industries, Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
"We're looking at better ways of aligning our interests," he said. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
" 2009 WL 331470, at *6 (discussing In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
