Search for: "Board of Public Instruction v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am by Matthew Flinn
He had to be given sufficient information so as to be able to give effective instructions to the special advocate. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
For publication opinions today (8): Larry Keesling, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December… [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Acton and Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am by Anthony De Yurre
The Historical Board held a public hearing in which the plan was adopted and a Certificate of Appropriateness was granted. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Mukasey    Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0365p.06 2008/10/08 Rose Bogaert v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 8:11 am by Julia Malleck
In a Justice Department briefing, Sessions stated that the “culture of leaking must stop. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:18 am
Vladek (Georgetown University) stated the following: “While the public watches the Supreme Court wrestle with the preemption questions presented in Reigel v. [read post]