Search for: "Boyd v. Doe" Results 341 - 360 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
This division does not abrogate or limit any person's responsibility under section 2151.421 of the Revised Code to report child abuse that is known or reasonably suspected or believed to have occurred, child neglect that is known or reasonably suspected or believed to have occurred, and children who are known to face or are reasonably suspected or believed to be facing a threat of suffering abuse or neglect and does not preclude any exercise of the authority of the … [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The Crown Court at Manchester: guidance  In relation to offences dealt with in the Crown Court, more specific guidance may now be taken from the remarks of the Recorder of Manchester (His Honour Judge Gilbart QC) in R v Carter, Beswick, Boyd, Gillespie-Doyle - 16th August 2011. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
tend not to go far (recall how exciting Klein v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am by INFORRM
In contrast to the “Model Interim Non-Disclosure Order” in the Master of the Rolls’ Practice Guidance [pdf] the order does not recite the Court’s reasons for making the order without notice. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:10 am by Kevin Houchin
The black-letter law of defamation does a pretty good job filtering the wheat from the chaff in most cases. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Along with it, he filed a petition for review (Muhammad v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm by Mairead Enright
One Law For All does well to agitate for Muslim women’s rights at a difficult time. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:21 pm
In today’s case (Smagh v. [read post]