Search for: "Bradley v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 1,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Gerald Neuman and Harold Koh, among others, responded to Bradley and Goldsmith (Koh had been co-counsel in numerous human rights cases, including Kadic v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm by Kyle Bradley
For example, Knudsen notes that the Supreme Court has addressed the meaning of “waters of the United States” in the Clean Water Act four separate times—most recently in Sackett v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am by Amy Howe
  Brian Wolfman and Bradley Girard previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
Following orders, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:19 am by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
Perhaps most famously, following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February 2016, the court issued an equally divided decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:42 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The same morning that Justice Gorsuch gave his speech, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Janus v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
In 1901, James Bradley Thayer wrote a short biography of Chief Justice John Marshall. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:39 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
Then, in the wake of a lawsuit brought against then-Durham County prosecutor James Hardin, Jr., Simeon v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:08 am
Relying on the earlier case of R (Bradley) v Work and Pensions Secretary [2008], the Court held that government can lawfully reject the findings of an Ombudsman that there has been maladministration, but only on the basis of objectively justifiable, cogent reasons. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Fakhimi & Associates
The courts were denying Bradley Register those documents because, as it rightly stated, he had waived his right to appeal. [read post]