Search for: "Bray"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Here are the results, sorted by the texts that included the greatest number of our 100 cases: Choper, Dorf, Fallon, and Schauer: 80 cases Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, & Karlan: 73 cases Chemerinsky: 71 cases Maggs & Smith: 69 cases Farmer, Eskridge, Frickey, and Schacter: 68 cases Varat & Amar: 67 cases Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar, & Siegel: 64 cases Feldman & Sullivan: 64 cases Paulsen, Calabresi, McConnell, Bray, and Baude: 63 cases Weaver, Friedland,… [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:37 pm
Law professors Samuel Bray, David Marcus and Stephen Yeazell filed an amicus brief in support of neither party that is a master class on this history of the discovery rule and its role in fraud cases. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:03 am
"This is all in plain sight in the opinion of the Court," says Bray. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Professor Mila Sohoni is the author of a string of significant articles on administrative law, and two of her forthcoming articles are about national injunctions. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:32 pm
This last, headed ‘Political judges must face scrutiny after doing the bidding of braying Remainers’, calls Johnson the ‘victim’ of a ‘staggering legal coup’ and argues that ‘in one unprecedented act of constitutional vandalism, 11 judges became an unelected political entity, granting themselves immense power to overrule our Government and Queen’. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
[A "sternly put" judicial opinion on national injunctions and the APA] Another day, another national injunction. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Bray Will Baude [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
Last but not least, I'm very grateful to Sam Bray for his courteous invitation to post about this draft here at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm
[Context and the statute/Constitution difference] This is the latest in a series of posts about The Mischief Rule. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 4:43 am
[Is the mischief rule just purposivism?] [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:03 am
[The mischief in CSX, Yates, and Zarda] This post is the fourth in a series on The Mischief Rule. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:41 pm
[The mischief, pragmatics, and legislative history] This is the third in a series of posts about The Mischief Rule. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
[Does the statute mean that trains have to stop for squirrels?] [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:44 am
Sam Bray and I agree on the impropriety of universal injunctions--I am the NAIA version of Sam as opponent of universality. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court has had a number of major statutory interpretation cases in recent years. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:30 pm
[Are the days of the national injunction numbered?] [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm
My friend and former colleague Sam Bray writes in Reason that: There was a very significant decision yesterday from the Seventh Circuit on whether the Federal Trade Commission can seek restitution... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:58 pm
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Samuel Bray has a post titled “A major decision on the FTC and equitable restitution; The Seventh Circuit reverses course. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:43 am
[The Seventh Circuit reverses course] There was a very significant decision yesterday from the Seventh Circuit on whether the Federal Trade Commission can seek restitution under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
[The Parable of the Forms] If you are starting law school this fall, one of your classes might be civil procedure. [read post]
