Search for: "Briggs v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 8:25 pm
Briggs, 64 M.J. 285, 287 (C.A.A.F. 2007)(citing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
” Citing a 1948 case — Briggs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The measure would have no fiscal effect on state or local governments. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:20 am
., and Michael Farley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Briggs Ave. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:43 am
This issue has led to divergent opinions in the district courts.The decision in Briggs Avenue LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Supply v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:31 am
And in Bentley Estate v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25] Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26] Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
The English Court of Appeal, for example, in Brian Watson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:41 am
Briggs v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Briggs v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:24 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:09 pm
Briggs, 64 M.J. 285 (C.A.A.F. 2007); United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
