Search for: "Broadcast Music, Inc"
Results 341 - 360
of 609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
The court reaffirms that the knowledge requirement in 512(c) requires actual knowledge and not some general knowledge that because things like music videos are uploaded or stored within the system; there must be knowledge of unauthorized content. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/nans1qay6k -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-26 http://t.co/0rd9a1Odp7 -> Canadian green patents rocketing http://t.co/1hvkw2oKvU -> TekSavvy illegal downloading case risks bogging down legal system, judge says http://t.co/qdSkxVCWmc -> Music Canada AGM 2013 http://t.co/bURqOv4RAe -> Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Skype and Yahoo Hit With Prism Data Protection Complaints In Europ http://t.co/33HJWkmvea -> McCarthy Tétrault, the only firm… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
Entm’t Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:24 am
Warner currently earns an estimated $2 million per year in license fees from the song meaning, if successful, it could have to return approximately $8 million on licensed paid to it. 2: BMI to File Lawsuit Against Pandora Over Licensing Fees Next up today Tom Cheredar at VentureBeat reports that Broadcast Music Inc (BMI), which collects and negotiates license fees on behalf of songwriters, composers and music publishers, is preparing to sue Internet streaming… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:36 am
However, the legal issues over the track may not be over as the people behind the release of the track hinted on a Facebook page that they were working on an official release of the song as well as four other demo tracks from the band. 3: BMI Freaks Out Over TMZ Copyright Story Finally today, Lars Brandle at Billboard reports that Broadcast Music Inc. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:42 pm
Intercollegiate Broadcast System Inc. filed a petition with the court saying that, under the Constitution, the board should be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate instead of appointed by the Librarian of Congress. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:17 pm
In consolidated appeals, the court agreed with the district court that plaintiff lacked standi… read more » Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am
Alice Corp http://t.co/4b9u2FKyC6 -> Is a broadcast to everyone private under the Copyright Act? [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/5cUgbQBWtB -> Netflix Says It’s ‘Killing’ BitTorrent Traffic http://t.co/VdhC2zWj9M -> Craigslist, Inc. v. 3Taps INC., Dist. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
S.31D creates a statutory licensing regime that allows compliant broadcasters to broadcast any literary and musical works or sound recordings. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The first definition is easy to conceive — a band in a concert hall is clearly performing a musical work publicly. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:27 pm
In Bishop, for example, there were two activities: 1) the making of an ephemeral copy of the musical work in order to effect a broadcast, and 2) the actual broadcast of the work itself. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:14 am
Indianapolis, IN - Copyright lawyers for Broadcast Music, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
He never broadcasted his show on TV. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:20 pm
Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Broadcast Music, Inc., 1966 Trade Cas. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:02 am
Sol Entertainment and Hispanic Radio Broadcast Inc. filed the complaint in the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
”7 The statute lists several categories of works which may be protected, including “(1) literary works; (2) musical works, including any accompanying words; (3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music; (4) pantomimes and choreographic works; (5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; (6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works; (7) sound recordings; and (8) architectural works. [read post]
