Search for: "Burgess v. Burgess" Results 341 - 360 of 397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In 1755 Washington mounted his first campaign for the Virginia House of Burgesses, the colonial legislature. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
O'Brien & Burgess Docket: 08-1569 Argument date: February 23, 2010 Question presented: In a federal gun case, does the judge decide whether the gun was a machine gun by a preponderance of the evidence, or must the jury find that beyond a reasonable doubt? [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On Friday 15 March 2024 there was an application in the case of Leeds and Another v Burgess and Others, QB-2021-000067. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 9 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles and Saini J continued to hear the trial in Packham CBE v Wightman and ors. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico, Seung Min Kim and Burgess Everett report that Arkansas Sen. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” For Politico, Burgess Everett and Elana Schor report that “Kavanaugh’s nomination is already a huge headache for … Senate minority leader” Chuck Schumer of New York. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
Hourly billing v fixed-fees. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm by familoo
This is particularly so in light of a recent judgment from the Court of Appeal on the potential for a claim in negligence against a professional offering advice, see Burgess & Anor v Lejonvarn [2016] EWHC 40 (TCC) (15 January 2016) where Alexander Nissen QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) held : In conclusion, it is established that in law a duty of care extends to the protection against economic loss in respect of both advice and any service in… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
  The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am by Andrew Delaney
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Additional coverage comes from Burgess Everett and John Bresnahan for Politico and Seung Min Kim of the Washington Post. [read post]