Search for: "C v. B" Results 341 - 360 of 22,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2019, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
The defendants moved the District Court to dismiss all counts under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), alleging that the patents did not meet the eligibility requirements of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:13 am by FHH Law
But heads up, because that does not apply to §§1.2105(a)(2)(xii) and (c)(6); 1.2204(a), (c), (d)(3), and (d)(5); 1.2205(c) and (d); 1.2209; 2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv); 15.713(h)(10); 27.14(k) and (t)(6); 27.17(c); 27.19(b) and (c); 73.3700(b)(1)(i) through (v), (b)(2)(i) and (ii), (b)(3), (b)(4)(i) and (ii), and (b)(5); 73.3700(c); 73.3700(d);… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:30 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
B&C and Acta are pleased to present “What to Expect in Chemicals Policy and Regulation and on Capitol Hill in 2024,” featuring Richard E. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:41 pm by Harold O'Grady
Weinstein’s well-researched 126 page Statement of Reasons for Sentencing Pursuant to 18 USC § 3553(c)(2) in US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 2:45 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
§ 841(b)(1)(C) have a “covered offense” under Section 404 of the First Step Act. [read post]