Search for: "C. C. v. State Department of Human Resources"
Results 341 - 360
of 611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who uses E-Verify to confirm the legality of its workforce should become familiar with the new strict parameters regarding its use, and establish acceptable policies and training for human resources, as well as documenting their actual use of it. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who uses E-Verify to confirm the legality of its workforce should become familiar with the new strict parameters regarding its use, and establish acceptable policies and training for human resources, as well as documenting their actual use of it. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who uses E-Verify to confirm the legality of its workforce should become familiar with the new strict parameters regarding its use, and establish acceptable policies and training for human resources, as well as documenting their actual use of it. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
Grubbs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Whereas law-blogging resources generally advise lawyers to write in a friendly, attention-grabbing style, Microstyle and How to Write Short give hundreds of examples of what that means and how to do it. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:28 pm
C. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:43 am
Two years later, and within a few weeks after the hospital settled Doe’s sexual harassment suit, the employee was called into a meeting with his department director, the VP of human resources, and the hospital’s corporate counsel. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Is it a C-level accountability and part of the day-to-day business focus? [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Since violation of these out-of-pocket maximums (as well as many other federal health benefit rules) can trigger an obligation for the employer to self-assess, self-report by filing a Form IRS Form 8928, and pay excise taxes of up to $100 per day, as well as expose the plan and its fiduciaries to ERISA lawsuits from covered persons, the Department of Labor or both, insurers and administrators also should review their group health plan provisions and their administration in operation to… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Stamer works with businesses and their management, employee benefit plans, governments and other organizations deal with all aspects of human resources and workforce management operations and compliance. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions under Section 502(b)… [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
Further, at [68], any such assessment … would be extraordinarily burdensome in terms of cost and resources and – in the overwhelming number of cases – simply futile. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
C. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
The statistics generated by Prof. de Beer will no doubt be used by those who perennially argue that the Board needs more resources. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am
<> Dan Fette v. [read post]
