Search for: "C. K. R." Results 341 - 360 of 4,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Gerekçeli kararını "infazda eşitlik" ilkesine göre veren Hakim, denetimli serbestlikten gasp, hırsızlık gibi yüz kızartıcı suçların dahi yararlandığını vurguladı. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Wer eine Facebook-Seite betreibt, ist gemäss EuGH-Urteil C-210/16 für den Datenschutz gemeinsam mit Facebook verantwortlich. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 8:06 am
Dagegen brachten die Kläger vor, im Anwendungsbereich von OR 336 II c und 336a III (s. oben) sei die Entschädigung auch dann geschuldet, wenn die Kündigungen nicht wirksam werden. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Matter of R-K-K-, 26 I&N Dec. 658 (BIA 2015); The Board held that an Immigration Judge may rely on documents and statements from another asylum case while making an adverse credibility determination. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This way of proceeding is stipulated both in Legal Advice n° 15/05 and in the Guidelines (C-VI 4.1) and is based on the case law of the Boards of appeal (T 1181/04, T 1255/04). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:15 am
It's called "sexting" and it often involves sending half naked photos over a cell phone.If you think your child isn't doing it, it may because your teen is working hard to K-P-C (keep parents clueless) by using a secret sexting language.Here's a look at the code teenagers [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
An employee, Mrs Ariane C., was in charge of these operations. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Maddesine gerekse ülkemizin taraf olduğu Avrupa normlarına açıkça aykırılık teşkil etmektedir. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:29 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Murder of Adam Walsh (Photo credit: Wikipedia) K is for Kidnapped Children. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
ktidardaki gücün, Küresel sermayenin etkisi, böyle istemesi bir yana Türk hukukçular? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Pursuant to R 108(1), the petition for review is to be rejected as inadmissible if it does not comply with this provision.The petitioner, who is adversely affected by the impugned decision, bases his petition for review on the violation of his right to be heard pursuant to A 113(1) together with A 112a(2)(c) both in the opposition and the opposition appeal proceedings. [read post]