Search for: "CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT V US" Results 341 - 360 of 1,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Third District Court of Appeal applied the California Supreme Court precedent in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by A. Rahman Ford
The repercussions of using human stem cells in medical research and practice could be the most seismic since Henrietta Lacks and her versatile HeLa cells. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 7:51 am by INFORRM
The Court ruled that the Park was a public forum and that the rules which prohibited free speech and petitions in the Park violated the right to free speech under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.GeorgiaKatamadze v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020):  On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am by Léon Dijkman
District Court for the Northern District of California, requesting it to set the terms for a global FRAND-licence. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Instead, each dispute would be based on developed and discrete factual records concerning affected entities and with the benefit of authoritative interpretations of the relevant statutes by the California courts. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: The American nicotine market is developing faster than ever due to introduction of non-combustible recreational nicotine products. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
” The central issue before us is whether, even assuming such a broad constitutional right exists, an Article III court can provide the plaintiffs the redress they seek—an order requiring the government to develop a plan to “phase out fossil fuel emissions and draw down excess atmospheric CO2. [read post]