Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 341 - 360 of 1,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
While legal scholars have long recognized that shadow trading can be profitable, SEC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Eric Goldman
Companies on my shitlist include: 1-800 Contacts, Overstock…and now Edible Arrangements. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 11:00 am
In today's LA Times, David Savage focuses on the the Court's decision to accept the Leegin case and to reconsider a long-standing rule that forbids companies from fixing prices in this article. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:52 pm
On occasion, you make your gallery spaces available for a price for social events. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:52 pm
On occasion, you make your gallery spaces available for a price for social events. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
ICANN wants federal regulators to declare the pricing scheme illegal so that it can take action against the operator, but if it doesn’t get bailed out by these government enforcers, it won’t do anything. * The most significant keyword advertising loss in Europe, Interflora v Marks & Spencer, was overturned and ordered for a retrial. * Treemo, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Heather M. Milligan
Many corporate legal departments are being hit hard, because their companies are being hit hard. [read post]