Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 6:41 pm
At issue in the case was whether the employer’s settlement and release agreements entered into with individual employees settling disputed overtime wages were valid and enforceable under California law. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:09 am
Also, California law does not only apply to dogs or miniature horses but can include any animal that meets the above definitions. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
It comes from California, where a coalition of undocumented university students, their professors, and legal academics (including me) have argued that the University of California (UC) already has legal authority to open employment opportunities to all students regardless of their immigration status. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:37 am
Click here to send a letter to your legislators. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:16 pm
Rite Aid, the Court of Appeal made clear employers are not liable under harassment law for employees’ off-duty actions completely unrelated to work, even between a supervisor and subordinate. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
Via H-Law, we have the following job posting:The History Department at the University of California, Irvine, seeks to hire a tenure-track assistant professor in 20th-century United States history whose research focuses on political economy, intellectual history, and/or legal history. [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:26 am
We have seen indications that the AG’s office is reviewing the list of covered employers and writing letters to companies about compliance. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
In addition, as many California employers know, California labor laws and regulations are regularly changing. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:16 am
Under California law, if an employee has unused accrued vacation at the end of his/her employment, the employer must pay out the unused but accrued vacation. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:13 am
Roberts, Employment Law Counsel/Subject Matter Expert Everyone can read more about COVID-19: New Federal PSL and Expanded FMLA in the HR Library. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:01 pm
California bill would bar employers from inquiring about an applicant’s prior salary. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the law does not require employers to provide off-duty rest periods, and moreover, "simply being on call" does not constitute performing work.The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal, holding as follows: California law "requires employers to authorize off-duty rest periods — that is, time during which an employee is relieved from all work-related duties and free from employer… [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 12:59 pm
The skilled Oakland employment discrimination attorneys at the Law Offices of Stephen M. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
While the updated withholding tables are designed to work with existing Forms W-4 that employers have on file, many taxpayers (such as those with children or multiple jobs, and those who itemized deductions under prior law) are affected by the new law in ways that can’t be accounted for in the new withholding tables. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
While the updated withholding tables are designed to work with existing Forms W-4 that employers have on file, many taxpayers (such as those with children or multiple jobs, and those who itemized deductions under prior law) are affected by the new law in ways that can’t be accounted for in the new withholding tables. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
There is no clarity to be found in the general statutory structure, the legislative history, legislative responses to advocate letters, or the technical amendments signed into law on September 23. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:48 pm
The post Los Angeles City begins “Ban The Box” enforcement July 1, 2017 appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm
Although the letter focused on state-funded veteran rights, it does provide guidance for employers as well. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm
If you do not settle the matter with the Board, your case proceeds to a formal hearing before an administrative law judge. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:07 am
More specifically, AFTRA’s letter asserts that Nick requires “that the performer grant to the employer a right to a ‘profit participation’ interest in the talent’s third-party income as a condition of employment” in violation of AFTRA’s collective bargaining agreement and possibly California law. [read post]
