Search for: "California v. Evans"
Results 341 - 360
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 4:40 am
”Here's an excerpt from the opinion:Rose v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
In September I mentioned that the volume of Qualcomm's share buybacks is simply irreconcilable with last year's claim (by Qualcomm's lead counsel in the Apple case in the Southern District of California, Cravath's Evan Chesler) that the house was "on fire," and in that post I quoted an analyst who complained about an unusual degree of discrepancy between what Qualcomm tells judges and what it tells financial analysts. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:24 am
Then there's the Pepper v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am
It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
Hayley Evans outlined the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity strategy. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
California is second with 352. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:07 am
Evans, and Andrew M. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:54 pm
In a subsequent California case, decided in 2000 (Christian Scientist Board v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:33 pm
" Perry v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Evans (1996), United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Evans (1996), United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
The Court thus equated Proposition 8 to the Colorado laws struck down inRomer v Evans, and structured its decision around the fact that Proposition 8 singled out homosexual couples for differential treatment by removing a right which they had previously enjoyed on an equal basis to everyone else. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
The Court thus equated Proposition 8 to the Colorado laws struck down in Romer v Evans, and structured its decision around the fact that Proposition 8 singled out homosexual couples for differential treatment by removing a right which they had previously enjoyed on an equal basis to everyone else. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”Previewing the attitude that would be on display in the Clark case, Doug Evans called the Flowers case “a ridiculous ruling. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm
(LA Neighbors United v. [read post]
