Search for: "California v. Miranda"
Results 341 - 360
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Jackson, No. 072510 Conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded where defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation before being given his Miranda warnings. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of California, et al. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Green, No. 06-2468 Conviction for distribution of cocaine is vacated and remanded for a new trial where: 1) the written statement of a confidential informant naming defendant as the person who had sold him drugs in a controlled buy was hearsay and not subject to an exception as a present-sense impression; 2) the prosecution could not use in its case-in-chief as substantive evidence the responses and reactions of defendant upon seeing a video purporting to depict him selling drugs, when the showing… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Supreme Court, April 23, 2008 Virginia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:13 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:44 pm
I argue that the safeguards of Miranda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986); and 2) any unreasonable application of Miranda v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:04 pm
As soon as I glanced at United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
