Search for: "California v. Superior Court" Results 341 - 360 of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Circuit City was attempting to challenge the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 with respect to contractual class action waivers in the context of non-waivable labor law rights? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:49 pm by Justin Keith
Superior Ct., the California Supreme Court clarified the nature of an employer’s duty to “provide” employees with meal breaks, as well as the timing requirements of meal and rest periods. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
 But apparently it takes an opinion in the Court of Appeal.For civil procedure folks, this result seems self-evident. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 3:36 pm
These cases reflect the near-universal rule that state court judges in Utah love Utah's courts (and laws), whereas California state court judges often love California's courts (and laws). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Reed and Ryan McCoy Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:03 pm
So sayeth the California Court of Appeal, which reverses the dismissal of an indictment. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
Paris Hilton's brother gets good news from the Court of Appeal.Writ granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:45 am by James (Jim) A. Goodman
Superior Court (California Ct App 11/04/2009) serves as a reminder that when litigating, the definition of the trade secrets at issue is important. [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:52 pm by Arkady Itkin
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc., v Superior Court, making it even harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors (rather than employees). [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm by Bryan Hawkins and Robert Sarkisian
Superior Court[2], the California Supreme Court while addressing the scope of discovery for PAGA cases opined that the “trial of the [PAGA] action must be ‘manageable. [read post]