Search for: "Catoe v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
United States, and Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
Argentina, while Robert Barnes of The Washington Post previews Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:28 am by SHG
Wally, ever the optimist, hopes that circuit court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm by Ilya Somin
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato on Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Michael Collins urge the court to review Higginson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws preempt several provisions of Arizona’s S.B. 1070. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
  No doubt Donald Trump will complain about various features of the electoral process, but there is no serious argument--i.e., none whatsoever--that Democratic political officials are trying to prevent Republicans from voting.I note with interest that Doug Bandow, of the Cato Institute, is advocating secession and, therefore, the breaking up of the United States.. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Robert A Levy - Guest
United States for a unanimous Court put it this way:  “The limitations that federalism entails are not therefore a matter of rights belonging only to the States. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:12 am by SHG
When the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed with prejudice the indictment in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:38 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Walter Olson weighs in on Wednesday’s opinion in Young v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:47 am by Amy Howe
” At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Gabe Latner discuss Luis v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]