Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:35 pm by Administrator
v) What does the prosecution need to establish in this case under Article 25(3)(a) of the Statute? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by igorodetski
These concerns are especially well founded in light of cases such as Chevron v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 7:16 am
The last iteration of STATE v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:45 am by Ted Frank
Medicaid will get only more expensive if the Supreme Court affirms a Ninth Circuit decision in a pending case, Douglas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
The Justices ask about the wording of the 2011 AV Referendum Act and Chambers QC confirms that he will provide the relevant provision which shows the different wording used, which confirms that Parliament is handing over its sovereignty (in contrast to that used in the 2015 Act). 14:17: Dominic Chambers QC reiterates that the 2015 Act contained no requirement for the UK government to implement the result or set a timeline in relation to the referendum. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:33 pm by Adam Feldman
The case involving the most attorneys from Chambers’ list over the past two terms was the patent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:24 am by Heather Wallace
The state high court’s August 22 decision not to review the case leaves unchanged the April 14 appeals court ruling in Vergara v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]