Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 1:14 pm
DuPont Chambers Works, 206 N.J. 243, 256 (2011)). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Justices ask about the wording of the 2011 AV Referendum Act and Chambers QC confirms that he will provide the relevant provision which shows the different wording used, which confirms that Parliament is handing over its sovereignty (in contrast to that used in the 2015 Act). 14:17: Dominic Chambers QC reiterates that the 2015 Act contained no requirement for the UK government to implement the result or set a timeline in relation to the referendum. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
Under Chambers v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm
The following year, in Chambers v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:31 pm
Harting, Munich case no. 21 O 16782/20), andC-182/21 for the SEP case (Nokia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 1:18 pm
Cameco Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 7:16 am
The last iteration of STATE v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:33 pm
The case involving the most attorneys from Chambers’ list over the past two terms was the patent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
United States and Ohio v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:14 pm
Here is the citation: Federated Insurance Co. of Canada v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:56 pm
The post Case Comment: R (AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:04 am
Malone-Pass v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:24 am
The state high court’s August 22 decision not to review the case leaves unchanged the April 14 appeals court ruling in Vergara v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:18 am
Federal Election Commission, the case that could overturn the landmark Austin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In J.C. and Others v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:20 am
" Symbolically, the case of Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
In Hay v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
38224/03) ECtHR (Grand Chamber) – 14 Sept 2010. [read post]
