Search for: "Chancellor v. Chancellor"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Tatel; Kaya Henderson, Chancellor of the D.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:27 am
In Vintage Rodeo Parent, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:36 pm
In contrast to the decision in the American Messaging Services ruling by the same Vice Chancellor on the same date, highlighted here on these pages, in AM General Holdings LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:29 pm
Pileggi also talks about the recent ruling in Case Financial v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
We have had a few things to say about Chancellor Allen's well-known Caremark decision, but this post is about the new Caremark case, which is called Louisiana Municipal Police Employee Retirement System v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:37 pm
In Cephalon, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
Last week, in Grabski v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am
I have a few thoughts about Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:17 am
NewRadio Group LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Chester County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
In Matter of Andersen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
The Court of Chancery has since adhered to this view in Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:31 pm
Rodriguez, et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
I wrote about that argument in my article The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine (July 29, 2003), where I explained that: In Dodge v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 10:28 pm
Decided on December 21, 2006, ATR-Kim Eng Financial Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In the case of Seaport Village Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:09 pm
(Seinfeld v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 10:14 am
"The Chancellor went on to assure that his holding was in line with that of Vice Chancellor Strine’s in Desimone v. [read post]