Search for: "City of Santa Monica"
Results 341 - 360
of 624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 1:23 pm
Los Angeles intends to extend their subway system further into West Los Angeles / Santa Monica and the San Fernando Valley, for instance and increased ridership will, no doubt result in some additional mishaps. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:58 am
With the help of Santa Monica civil rights attorney Carol Sobel, Plaintiffs appealed Judge Walter’s decision to the Ninth Circuit, and petitioned the court to issue an injunction against enforcement of Section 403. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:56 pm
On October 31, 2013, the City of Santa Monica filed a complaint in federal court against the United States of America and the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") with the hope of confirming its alleged right to control the fate of the Santa Monica Airport. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:01 am
See, City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:45 pm
The Huffington Post reports, that the city council in Santa Monica will review a bill that allowed two medical marijuana dispensaries. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 7:21 pm
Some highlights of projects receiving funding this year as 2013 winds to a close: Los Angeles received (i) $26 million to improve the Port of Los Angeles, (ii) $20 million to widen the I-5 freeway from the Orange County Line to the I-5/I-605 junction, and (iii) $28 million for the Exposition Light Rail Project between Culver City and Santa Monica. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
Role of binding arbitration [Malanga, IBD] Since declaring bankruptcy San Bernardino has given police $2 million in raises [Scott Shackford] Twenty-eight members of Santa Monica police force made more than $200K last year [Ira Stoll, Future of Capitalism] “Do other big city balance sheets resemble Detroit’s? [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:43 am
The internet has been abuzz lately with talk about the latest legal action filed by the City of Santa Monica (“City”) against the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), on October 31, 2013, seeking to avoid FAA’s refusal to allow the closure of Santa Monica Airport, see City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:55 pm
City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal.4th 203 (2013). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 (discussed here), which held: A plaintiff in an action under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) must prove that unlawful discrimination was a “substantial factor motivating” the alleged adverse employment action; A defendant in such an action may use a “mixed-motive” defense by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would have made the same decision absent such… [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 2:12 pm
Got behind on posts this week because on Thursday I gave a presentation in Santa Monica on legal-ethics issues that arise in connection with electronic discovery. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 10:24 pm
City of Santa Monica mixed motive case. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:58 am
Beginning in February 2007, the Expo Authority started studying Expo Phase 2 (a light-rail line running from a station in Culver City through the Westside area of Los Angeles to Santa Monica). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:00 pm
City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 (discussed here), the California Supreme Court held: A plaintiff in an action under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) must prove that unlawful discrimination was a “substantial factor motivating” the alleged adverse employment action; A defendant in such an action may use a “mixed-motive” defense by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would have made the same decision… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:58 am
City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal.4th 203 (2013), because a FEHA discrimination claimant now is required to show that the protected status was a “substantial motivating reason” for the adverse action, and not merely “a motivating reason,” as the earlier versions of the jury instructions stated. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
With the passing away of Ms Piza, the road was clear for her descendants to arrange a shareholders agreement of October 24, 2012, under which the share ownership of Hacienda Santa Monica, S.A., was reorganized. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
The Expo Phase 2 project’s purpose is to provide high-capacity transit service between the City of Los Angeles’ (LA) Westside area andSanta Monica, accommodating population and employment growth, improving mobility for Westside’s large transit-dependent population, providing an alternative to congested roadways, and enhancing access to LA,Culver City,Santa Monicaand other destinations in the rail corridor. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:18 pm
Background In Neighbors for Smart Rail, project opponents challenged the EIR for Phase 2 of the Expo Line light rail project that would connect Culver City and Santa Monica, alleging the EIR improperly used projected future conditions in 2030 as a baseline for analyzing traffic and air quality impacts. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:18 am
Background In Neighbors for Smart Rail, project opponents challenged the EIR for Phase 2 of the Expo Line light rail project that would connect Culver City and Santa Monica, alleging the EIR improperly used projected future conditions in 2030 as a baseline for analyzing traffic and air quality impacts. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 10:58 am
City of Santa Monica specifically dealt with a mixed motive case. [read post]
