Search for: "Claimants" Results 341 - 360 of 30,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
To establish prima facie infringement under UK law:A claimant needs to demonstrate – in accordance with section 16 CDPA – that the defendant has done any of the restricted acts in relation to the work as a whole or any substantial part of it. [read post]
The court held that the claimant in this case sought to raise a question of mixed fact and law. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
It may also indicate whether the claimant’s daily activities include childcare-related tasks. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:41 am by Ronald Mann
As the insurer points out, the debtor and the claimants have no interest in the problem – the debtor does not care if the insurer must pay unfounded claims, and the claimants stand to benefit if they can receive multiple (fraudulent) recoveries. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:43 am by high rank
Chapter 4.22.005 of the Revised Code of Washington states that any fault allocated to the claimant diminishes the amount awarded as compensatory damages, but does not bar recovery. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:09 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
However, not all awarded funds reach the claimants; a portion remains unclaimed. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Second, I can also foresee claimants using the Act’s various development, use, or transparency requirements, or its ethical standards, as guidelines against which to measure alleged corporate misconduct, as a way to show that AI-related corporate conduct at issue in a lawsuit are shown to have fallen below legal standards. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
However, there are a number of differences: the claimant can base his claim not only on infringement, but also on imminent infringement (art. 60.1); the text indicates from the outset that the measures must be carried out subject to the protection of trade-secrets (although the procedure for its protection is not expressly provided for as in French law) (art. 60.1); a security may be required from the patentee (art. 60.7). [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
However, there are a number of differences: the claimant can base his claim not only on infringement, but also on imminent infringement (art. 60.1); the text indicates from the outset that the measures must be carried out subject to the protection of trade-secrets (although the procedure for its protection is not expressly provided for as in French law) (art. 60.1); a security may be required from the patentee (art. 60.7). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
” Anonymity orders under CPR r 39.2(4), which are permissive in nature (permitting proceedings to be issued in anonymised form), should be distinguished from interim non-disclosure orders (INDOs) made under CPR r 25 and PD 25A, which are prohibitive in nature (injunctions prohibiting disclosure of information, inter alia, identifying the claimant). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:21 pm by Francis Pileggi
Like Delaware, California allows fees on fees proportionate to the degree of success of a claimant. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
The surgeon denied these and three other claims against him, but ended up paying sizable settlements to each of those claimants for medical malpractice. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
The following is a guest post by Clare Feikert-Ahalt, a senior foreign law specialist at the Law Library of Congress covering the United Kingdom and several other jurisdictions. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:46 pm by Simon Gibbs
A claimant’s costs are set by reference to the damages agreed/awarded. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:46 pm by Simon Gibbs
A claimant’s costs are set by reference to the damages agreed/awarded. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
It considered that the independence of the claimants in taking procedural decisions was sufficiently guaranteed. [read post]