Search for: "Clements v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Judge Clement first analyzed and concluded that United States Supreme Court jurisprudence does not require punitive damages in unseaworthiness cases. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court vacated the lower court’s grant of summary judgment for the corporate parent (EEOC v Simbaki, Ltd, September 17, 2014, Clement, E). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Babbage Holdings, Inc., Case IPR2014-00954 (Clements) (August 22, 2014), Paper 17. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm by emagraken
 Clement explained, this type of injury is more consistent with people in a persistent vegetative state, which Ms. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am by Marty Lederman
Yoder, but merely returns the law to the state as it existed prior to Smith. . . . [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court further concluded that the employee failed to meet that standard and failed to show that the employer’s proffered reason for her termination (her inappropriate statements in two important meetings) were pretextual (Rogers v Bromac Title Services, LLC, June 18, 2014, Clement, E). [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:17 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Such a claim led to a successful claim for damages against the City of San Clemente in Avenida San Juan Partnership v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:12 am by K.O. Herston
’s Comment: For those dealing with criminal contempt sentencing issues, Simpkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]