Search for: "Coke v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2007, 7:31 am
Is "Coke is it" informational? [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
Coke. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
But every day holds a new surprise.For instance, the Missouri Court of Appeals this week ruled in Kolar v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:23 am
If consumers don't want mandatory arbitration, it will go the way of New Coke and Crystal Pepsi as employers and vendors offer contracts without mandatory arbitration. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
Barson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am
In 1881, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Egbert v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 11:35 am
He stated that he did not know what “fire white” was, or what “coke” was. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
While distribution of coke carried a 4 to 8 year penalty, if you imported it into the state of Colorado, you were a "special offender. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:25 am
In Mann v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Interestingly, Much of the argument concerned a 2009 ruling, Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:02 am
Disclose, disclose, disclose: All ads must state all limiting conditions. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
