Search for: "Com. v. Reason, R."
Results 341 - 360
of 411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Not even for medical reasons. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
The venerable X-COM was famous for this sort of thing, due in no small part to the simple mechanic that the player could choose names for each of his or her soldiers. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
Bydlinski, R. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
The reason for this, and one of the primary goals, was To ensure that patients and their primary caregivers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.1 Largely a failure, in terms of ensuring that it does what the voters voted for it to do, the Compassionate Use Act contained no provisions that prevented the arrest of anyone who obtained and used marijuana for medical purposes upon… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
R. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
(See, for example: Eysoldt v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Kenneth R. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Scott R. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One reason is the limited degree of uniformity created by the New York Convention which does not entirely eliminate differences between the national jurisdictions (especially in the context of arbitrability and public policy).11 The perspective of European law is different. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
Privacy Polls v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Although the Draft Guidelines have made news for many reasons, one underappreciated feature is the explicit inclusion—for the first time—of issues relating to common ownership. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
“[R]egulation cannot, in a liberal democracy, force viewers to consumer media products they do not think they want in the name of the public interest,” argues Goodman.[16] (This dilemma creates additional practical problems for proposals to expand public interest regulation, which will be discussed in Sec. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
(There’s a reason we don’t have direct democracy.) [read post]
