Search for: "Connecticut v. Massachusetts" Results 341 - 360 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
Evidently, the ACLU is taking credit for the pending DOMA challenges in California, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York, and Romero claims that “many more are being prepared in a half-dozen more states. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Six states—Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Nebraska, New York, and Pennsylvania—had implemented so-called convenience rules prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, while Massachusetts adopted a temporary income sourcing rule with the same effect in response to pandemic-era telework. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
City of Lewiston, 354 A.2d 154, 167 (Me. 1976); Massachusetts, Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE and the Politics of Supply… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am by Richard Hunt
Stigmatic Injury, how the 11th Circuit got it wrong Laufer v Looper – the death of tester standing Laufer v Looper Ch. 2 (4) The division between the legitimate and (in my view) illegitimate uses of the ADA and FHA is not as black and white as this makes it seem. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:53 pm
Connecticut court has jurisdiction to issue restraining order against North Carolina man who posted YouTube video threatening Connecticut woman [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, October 25, 1780 (Massachusetts Copyright Act, March 17, 1783).New Hampshire — “Article 22. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by Nabiha Syed
 In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor, Megan Brown describes the case as “novel, and far more aggressive and disruptive than” Massachusetts v. [read post]