Search for: "Cooper v. Superior Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
Although the Court in R. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:16 am
Volokh reports on New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
Ash v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Madison,[1]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)· Cooper v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm
Superior Ct. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:55 am
Shortly before the hearing the European Court of Justice held in mid-July, I discussed how the EC's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) might be able to defend its International Skating Union decision (which was affirmed by the EU General Court, but appealed further to the ECJ) while supporting the European Sports Model in European Superleague Company v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
The court didn’t buy it. #2 — Hughes v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:54 pm
In Palmore v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
Carey of Hampden County Superior Court found that the two prosecutors in 2014“tampered with the fair administration of justice” by misrepresenting issues to the court and concealing evidence beneficial to the defense. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:10 am
Superior Court, (1990) 226 Cal. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
In March of 2010 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Padilla v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:42 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:42 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly: Overton v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am
As Justice Cooper wrote in Baidoo, “[A] concept should not be rejected simply because it is novel or nontraditional. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, recently addressed this issue in Murdoch v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Criminal Procedural Law § 210.20(g) states in pertinent part that after arraignment upon an indictment, the superior court may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such indictment or any count thereof upon the ground that the defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial. [read post]
