Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C"
Results 341 - 360
of 7,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
Under section 6039 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and IRS rules, a corporation is required to provide a report to an employee of: (1) any transfer it makes to the employee, during the 2011 calendar year, of a share of stock pursuant to the employee's exercise of an "incentive stock option" ( within the meaning of section 422(b) of the Code), or (2) any record the corporation (or its agent) makes, during the 2011 calendar year, of a… [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Legal Services: From the War on Poverty to the War on Lawyers C. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
C. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
Others read B. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
The corporate veil cannot be lifted unless the principles in Ben Hashem apply. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
" The defendant argues, on appeal only that because he used the name of a fictitious person, 2B1.1(b)(10)(C)(I) doesn't apply. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:42 am
TweetLast Friday the Division of Corporation Finance released another set of Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs), mostly related to subsection (d) of the private offering exemption afforded by Regulation D, Rule 506 (bad actor disqualification) and the determination of beneficial ownership for purposes bad actor disqualification. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
In its complaint, Optical Devices relied exclusively on its agreements with various licensees, namely Sony Corporation, Sharp Corporation, and Sharp Electronics Corporation, to establish a domestic industry. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:01 am
C. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 7:19 pm
DOJ (D.D.C.) -- concluding that: (1) Criminal Division's creation of chart regarding selection of corporate compliance monitors for fifteen corporations did not satisfy obligation to conduct adequate search for records in absence of agreement with plaintiff; (2) Criminal Division properly invoked Exemption 4 to withhold company's compliance program concerning Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; (3) agency improperly withheld, pursuant to Exemption 6 and 7(C):… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
§ 18-1101(b). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:27 pm
Suppose there are 10 banks; a lends to b, b to c, etc. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm
A corporation’s scienter (i.e., fraudulent intent) may be imputed in a securities fraud case, under Second Circuit precedent, from (a) the scienter of an individual defendant who made the alleged misstatement, (b) the scienter of officers or directors who were involved in the dissemination of the fraud, or (c) in rare circumstances, from a statement that is so obviously incorrect that it can be inferred that the makers must have known that it was false. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Green owns several houses in the state, real estate ownership doesn’t automatically equate to domicile, so financial obligations related to Houses A, B, and C do not mean that Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
., d/b/a Just Think Media, an Alberta corporation, and Integraclick, Inc., d/b/a Clickbooth, a Delaware corporation, accusing them of a scheme to defraud consumers on the internet; the details are unimportant. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
Sometime in 1970, Congress enacted the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA), as amended, which authorized the formation of respondent corporation, a private nonprofit corporation, of which most broker-dealers registered under § 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 78o(b), are required to be members. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:46 pm
Nelson, J.D.The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has issued two new, unrelated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) covering executive compensation related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Form S-3 eligibility requirements in the context of shells and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 11:30 am
Marcuss and Michael B. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:33 am
Typical responses to a campaign can be grouped into three categories: (a) defensive (b) equivocal and (c) engaged. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:27 am
Applying in such assessments a principle of restraint in the form of a presumption against intervention unless it is shown: (a) that the harm to be mitigated by the intervention is systemic and substantial, (b) by credible evidence, that the intended mitigation is very likely to be achieved, and (c) that the adverse effects, if any, of the intervention are not likely to have as great or greater systemic impact than the benefit to be obtained by the intervention. [read post]
