Search for: "D C
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 341 - 360
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 9:38 am
" Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 171 comment d. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
Though Walker v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:07 pm
Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, et al. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
While there are differences from state to state, the approach taken by most states with respect to the practice of dentistry is fairly consistent. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
An Indiana Court of Appeals recently ruled that the state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not allow the state to impose its abortion restrictions on religious women. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Jeffrey D. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:24 pm
C. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Becker, Georgia State e-reserves case: states that the publisher’s right to collect fees is a powerful argument countering fair use which counsels against D when there is a reasonable licensing mechanism available that isn’t used. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
Additional References: Drewry, Michael F., “New Developments and Trends on Delay & Impact Claims”, Indiana State Bar Association, Construction & Surety Law Section, Annual Meeting, October 2004. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
Additional References: Drewry, Michael F., “New Developments and Trends on Delay & Impact Claims”, Indiana State Bar Association, Construction & Surety Law Section, Annual Meeting, October 2004. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:22 am
Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:01 am
Ohio State University v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
So we thought we’d do one of our 50-state updates on what states allow it and which ones don’t.Federal LawIt’s hard to see how market share liability could arise under federal law, but it has. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 4 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the case of D v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 157 (QB). [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
” Here, “by committing an ever-increasing amount of State funds to paying State employee salaries or overtime,” the federal executive “can unilaterally deplete State resources, forcing the States to adopt or acquiesce to federal policies, instead of implementing State policies and priorities. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
