Search for: "D J
v.
C R"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm
J., and STEVENS, THOMAS, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, an opin-ion with respect to Parts II–B and II–D, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
For the week of April 2 – 9: R. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
La surveillance spectrale utilise ce concept depuis les années 50, mais s’attache à rechercher des défauts déjà répertoriés, voire expliqués. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:30 am
[1] Ce type d’ordonnance, aussi appelée equitable bill of discovery en anglais, provient d’une décision rendue par la Chambre des lords dans Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners, [1973] 2 All ER 943 [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:46 am
Roberts, Frank C. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
This is something on which we have paused for thought in the past, and on which the cases are less than clear (see our notes on R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin)) but it isn't clear that Nicol J really grappled with that issue. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
This is something on which we have paused for thought in the past, and on which the cases are less than clear (see our notes on R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin)) but it isn't clear that Nicol J really grappled with that issue. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Exclusivist v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:54 am
Al-Barwani, Alexander J. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
En Banc ¶1 MADSEN, J. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:28 am
The Board notes that its approach, although it has not always consistently been applied in the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal, is also in line with the reasoning in earlier decisions which have argued that an appeal is deemed not to have been filed where the appeal fee was paid in time but the notice of appeal was filed only after expiry of the two-month period of Art.108(1) (see in particular decisions J 19/90, r.1.2.2 and 4; T 445/98, r.1.2, 5, 6 and 7; and T… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
That case is Kira Clifford v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
C. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
In re R. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
R (Joseph) v LB Newham [2008] EWHC 1637 (Admin) Blanket policies are unlawful. [read post]
