Search for: "D. C-W." Results 341 - 360 of 4,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Kozinski: they’d better, b/c the alternative is “who’s the panel? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The reason the D is using the mark has to be unsavory.Protecting innocent motives also reduces obligation of innocent parties to do too much search, esp if mark is fairly descriptive/not well known w/in a particular geog. area. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(A) we’re not, (B) if we were that would be troubling, (C) we are so far away from the purpose of the DMCA to protect (c) works from (c) infringement. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by scanner1
WARD and LaLONNIE WARD; JANNY KINION-MAY; C LAZY J RANCH; CHARLES BUMGARNER and KARLA BUMGARNER; CARL W. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Partly b/c there is strong opposition to legislative solutions. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ellen Schrantz, Internet Ass’n: Robust success: the most fundamental point is that w/o that law there’d be no expeditious removal; you’d still have the task of removing content but you’d have to sue to get it down w/o 512. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What normally happens when well funded P faces poorly funded D is that the lawsuit quickly ends b/c D can’t afford to fight. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Wednesday the Council will also hear the appeals of Apollon Metaxides v Swart & Ors (Bahamas) and Silver Point Condominium Apartments v Johann D Swart & Ors (Bahamas) concerning the proper approach of a court to the determination of the identity of a party in a case of doubt or ambiguity on the face of the originating process. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of D (a child), heard 3-4 Oct 2018. [read post]