Search for: "D. E.G. Y." Results 341 - 360 of 749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 7:36 am
Backgrounding: This is something I'd like to solicit feedback on. [read post]
26 May 2019, 8:22 pm
Third, the 2030 Economic Plan (Plan national de desarrollo económico y social hasta 2030: Propuesta de vision de la nación, ejes y sectores estratégicos) suggested reform not just of the political but also of the economic model “as applied” to the challenges of actual practice. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
By Joseph Scapellato Holocaust survivors and their heirs face substantial challenges in suits to recover Nazi-looted art in U.S. courts. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Last year we wrote a post on the OSHA Law Update blog regarding one very significant, recent case impacting this PPE analysis — Sec’y of Labor v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Steven B. Levy
Person X may not be as good a driver as person Y, but for this race X is driving. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
However, the non-nuanced soundbite-y version (e.g., “privacy and free speech are friends! [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:16 pm by Elie Mystal
But those of you who know me well know I don’t love many things (see, e.g., babies, warm fuzzy feelings, humanity). [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:56 am
The IPKat reports that there is a reference for a preliminary ruling winging its way to Luxembourg from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) on a plant varieties protection issue -- it's Case C-56/11 Raiffeisen-Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main e.G. v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The Kadıköy Criminal Court considered that Dickinson’s work was such as to humiliate and insult the Prime Minister and represented an attack on his honour and reputation. [read post]